[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Derived versus Explicit IV

To: Rob Adams <adams@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Derived versus Explicit IV
From: "ozan s. yigit" <oz@tor.securecomputing.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 15:32:45 -0400
cc: "'C. Harald Koch'" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>, "'ipsec@tis.com'" <ipsec@tis.com>, oz@tor.securecomputing.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com


> I don't know of any of my customers asking for this.

do you have a product to which this issue is relevant?

>	... This is all beside the fact the co-chair stated a very 
> 	strong opinion to obsolete it.

it is my understanding that these issues are decided with rough consensus
which i doubt chairman's opinions necessarily reflect. if i am mistaken
someone should say so.

oz
---
Always ... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better. And
twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad. And too much is never enough
except when it's just about right. -- The Tick.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Derived versus Explicit IV

From: Karl Fox <karl@Ascend.COM>

Prev by Date: RE: Derived versus Explicit IV
Next by Date: Re: ISAKMP performance
Prev by thread: RE: Derived versus Explicit IV
Next by thread: Re: Derived versus Explicit IV
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread