[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Derived versus Explicit technical rationale
Waste'o'bandwidth.
Bill, before you complain about other people's tempers, perhaps you should look at some
of your own remarks, such as "oppose till my dying breath." I can imagine statements
like these will raise a few tempers.
Please take further discussions of this ilk, off the list. We're all aware of how disfunctional
this group is. Lementing preceived broken agreements and peoples personalities,
including mine, doesn't get us anywhere closer to publishing documents. I include my
own past iniquities.
-Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: William Allen Simpson [SMTP:wsimpson@greendragon.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 1997 1:06 PM
To: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: Derived versus Explicit technical rationale
> From: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
> >From: William Allen Simpson[SMTP:wsimpson@greendragon.com]
> >
> >I ask for WG support for removing the Explicit IV from drafts for
> >Blowfish, CAST, RC5, et alia.
>
> Excuse Bill, but you are not the only one in this working group. Where
> do you come accross as having the authority of making a statement like
> that. Settle down and try to work WITH everyone else in this working
> group.
>
Perhaps you should settle down and re-read your own sentences here.
You have a self-contradiction.
...