Re: Calling the question: derived vs. explicit IV

[dharkins@bad.attitu.de]

  Add me to the list in favor of explicit IV.

  Dan.

> Derived:
>  1) Me
>  2) "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
>  3) "ozan s. yigit" <oz@tor.securecomputing.com>
>  4) Norman Shulman <norm@tor.securecomputing.com>
>  5) "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu>
>  6) Karl Fox <karl@Ascend.COM>
> 
> Explicit:
>  1) Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
>  2) Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
>  3) "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
>  4) Derrell Piper <piper@cisco.com>
> 
> Fence-sitting:
>  1) mark@mentat.com (Marc Hasson)
>     Fine, I really don't care which it is.
> 
>  2) Steven Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
>     In other words, I don't care very much about explicit vs. implicit IVs
>     for DES.  I don't think it makes any difference at all.  It may matter
>     for other ciphers.
> 
>  3) Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
>     ... The WG must decide on a
>     default, MUST implement encryption algorithm and mode and that decision
>     will weight space efficiency, confidentiality effectiveness, rekey
>     frequency, and existing implementations in some fashion.  This is a fairly
>     complex set of factors to consider, so I don't assume it will be an easily
>     objectifiable (did I really type that word?) decision.

---

References:

• Calling the question: derived vs. explicit IV
• From: "William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson@greendragon.com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Calling the question: implicit vs. explicit IV
• Next by Date: Re: Calling the question: implicit vs. explicit IV
• Prev by thread: Calling the question: derived vs. explicit IV
• Next by thread: Re: Calling the question: derived vs. explicit IV
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread