[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPSEC and NAT

To: hsw@columbia.sparta.com (Howard Weiss), smb@research.att.com (Steven Bellovin)
Subject: Re: IPSEC and NAT
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 10:02:44 -0400
Cc: dave@tlogic.com, ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <9708191321.AA03146@katahdin.columbia.sparta.com>
References: <199708191136.HAA04781@raptor.research.att.com>
Reply-To: rgm3@chrysler.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

At 09:21 AM 8/19/97 -0400, Howard Weiss wrote:
>
>Couldn't one tunnel through a NAT?

Well, yes.  Then the NAT will only see the outer envelope addresses.  The
inner envelope addresses will be unaltered (yeah, I know, 'if it is AH
only'...).

This might be good.  It might be disasterous.

Robert Moskowitz
Chrysler Corporation
(810) 758-8212

References:

Re: IPSEC and NAT

From: Steven Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>

Re: IPSEC and NAT

From: hsw@columbia.sparta.com (Howard Weiss)

Prev by Date: Re[2]: IPSEC and NAT
Next by Date: Re: Re[2]: IPSEC and NAT
Prev by thread: Re: IPSEC and NAT
Next by thread: Re: IPSEC and NAT
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread