[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: manual keying and IPSEC conformance

To: angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu (Angelos D. Keromytis)
Subject: Re: manual keying and IPSEC conformance
From: fyeung@fyeung8.netific.com (Francis Yeung)
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 18:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199708202258.SAA16167@coredump.cis.upenn.edu> from "Angelos D. Keromytis" at Aug 20, 97 06:58:28 pm
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

> 

Greetings,

	Me too. Manual keying should remain a requirement. IPSEC 
should be independent from KM. 

	Francis




> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> 
> I fully agree with Dan's answer on the subject. Manual keying should
> remain a requirement for all conforming IPSEC implementations.
> - -Angelos
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3i
> Charset: noconv
> Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
> 
> iQCVAwUBM/t2k70pBjh2h1kFAQHbEQP/X4yBPdti/m+1IJZR4DQzMDPo8a1sM4xw
> YtH7c0cVDCKeilmkvK6UyCGQiYur/lZfDvfkKwBB/KQOVcrM31WZoeCWCs3YzRWY
> Y6SHtLmQS1eL1tkCXKxJ6dfU2XWoURK76eAKIWrJiIsza0LcWB8yk82iibaelxBP
> lCleSbwNjz8=
> =a1zS
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
>

References:

Re: manual keying and IPSEC conformance

From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: anti-replay notification
Next by Date: Re: anti-replay notification
Prev by thread: Re: manual keying and IPSEC conformance
Next by thread: Re: manual keying and IPSEC conformance
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread