[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: manual keying and IPSEC conformance
If we keep manual keying as a MUST, then any implementation that does
not implement manual keying will be considered not IPSec-compliant. I
do not agree with this.
I know that most of our clients do not want a back door like manual
keying in their security product.
>----------
>From: Angelos D. Keromytis[SMTP:angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 1997 6:58 PM
>To: Dan.McDonald@Eng.Sun.Com
>Cc: ipsec@tis.com
>Subject: Re: manual keying and IPSEC conformance
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
>I fully agree with Dan's answer on the subject. Manual keying should
>remain a requirement for all conforming IPSEC implementations.
>- -Angelos
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: 2.6.3i
>Charset: noconv
>Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
>
>iQCVAwUBM/t2k70pBjh2h1kFAQHbEQP/X4yBPdti/m+1IJZR4DQzMDPo8a1sM4xw
>YtH7c0cVDCKeilmkvK6UyCGQiYur/lZfDvfkKwBB/KQOVcrM31WZoeCWCs3YzRWY
>Y6SHtLmQS1eL1tkCXKxJ6dfU2XWoURK76eAKIWrJiIsza0LcWB8yk82iibaelxBP
>lCleSbwNjz8=
>=a1zS
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Follow-Ups: