[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: manual keying and IPSEC conformance



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


In message <c=US%a=_%p=TimeStep_Corpora%l=TSNTSRV2-970821221049Z-6535@tsntsrv2.
timestep.com>, Roy Pereira writes:
>Perhaps "back door" was too strong of a statement, but manual keying
>might present a security risk if an uninformed user set it up
>incorrectly.

Nothing in the world can protect you if your priviledged users are
uninformed (well, maybe MLS).
- -Angelos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBM/zIur0pBjh2h1kFAQGubgP/eUSxzW2qPHpfvYY0jHC43+Y8JHfNi6t6
Ewuu2BgqcJI3WpqWr1ClM+4tX/gaV6BxIqCs3ZnojqNcSjz4mgdD7ECV4PYAveKr
UNGL5KDkzNAg7SKrjqHMJDG394G4JroRVCgn7AfK7LfrlffSxbhhABNIzlCdLRqO
9FAUiBdeh2E=
=pSS8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


References: