[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: order/nesting of IPsec headers (transport mode)

To: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: order/nesting of IPsec headers (transport mode)
From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 15:34:59 EDT
cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Aug 1997 23:45:39 EDT." <199708230352.XAA16321@relay.hq.tis.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


IMO, anything should be allowed. I see no reason to restrict
combinations of ESP and AH.
Cheers,
- -Angelos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBNACM470pBjh2h1kFAQEreQP+JbWieflRo2J2nAm9tAfLPN9+GeTH8BLV
QLhrk+EX77iar1zvDFUjp9vMzp5JHrEmiKmXDMj40l8d0xrBhZTOWUu7f3yOBfKR
cJvnloFMo5TONCnMu1mFVFd1yZ9D+bmwSEnWpDK7VB0OdzUU2Yw0kp8evVIxFdWN
sWrITlXKqXs=
=AqKM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:

order/nesting of IPsec headers (transport mode)

From: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>

Prev by Date: A few observations about the replay issue
Next by Date: Re: manual keying and IPSEC conformance
Prev by thread: Re: order/nesting of IPsec headers (transport mode)
Next by thread: order/nesting of IPsec headers (transport mode)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread