[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IPsec and Oakley test items
> I could also argue that this is not a discrepancy with the base ISAKMP
>spec. The M-ID and SPI would still identify the correct state as dictated
>by section 2.4. It's just that the M-ID and SPI would be in the body of
>the notify message as the ISAKMP header and SA payload to which the notify
>refers. The ISAKMP header of the Informational Exchange would be unique
>to the Informational Exchange.
Are there any plans in specifying "the additional Notification Data"
for particular error notifications? Is the data always the message
(in its entirety) that caused the error?
-dave