[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More inadequacies in draft-ietf-ipsec-ipsec-doi-03.txt...
We? Is that the royal, the medical, or the law enforcement "we"?
If you have any constructive suggestions then out with them. Point
out the self-contradictions, or how you view it as inadequate, suggest
replacement text and then "we" can get these drafts out.
I'm all in favor of pouring the concrete. Sooner the better.
Dan.
> Well, looks like I'll be joining the minority in doing so...
>
> What I really _meant_ to ask is whether anyone was able to make an
> implementation without assistance apart from the drafts (reference
> implementation was the first thought -- mailing list is the second).
> And, its not really a valid question, because I'm almost certain that
> the answer is going to be 'no'. If we're trying to get these drafts
> ready in any reasonable amount of time, something really needs to be
> done now to eliminate the inadequacies and self-contradictions within
> them.
References: