[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Slicing and dicing

To: Cheryl Madson <cmadson@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Slicing and dicing
From: Karl Fox <karl@Ascend.COM>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:03:32 -0700
Cc: Dan.McDonald@Eng.Sun.Com (Dan McDonald), mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca, ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199709121921.MAA12951@trix.cisco.com>
Organization: Ascend Communications
References: <199709121828.LAA13256@kebe.eng.sun.com><199709121921.MAA12951@trix.cisco.com>
Reply-To: Karl Fox <karl@Ascend.COM>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Cheryl Madson writes:
> I also didn't catch *what* would be the definitive reference 
> for listing weak/semi-weak/possibly-weak keys, since some folks 
> claim that Schneier is in error.

Summarizing the statements made to this list (I'll not comment on
whether or not that might be authoritative), Schneier is correct in
every entry except the one with an "F0" byte, which simply has the
wrong parity.
-- 
Karl Fox, servant of God, employee of Ascend Communications
655 Metro Place South, Suite 370, Dublin, Ohio  43017   +1 614 760 4041

References:

Re: Slicing and dicing

From: Dan.McDonald@Eng.Sun.Com (Dan McDonald)

Re: Slicing and dicing

From: Cheryl Madson <cmadson@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Ordering of payloads
Next by Date: Encryption + expansion of ISAKMP packets/payloads
Prev by thread: Re: Slicing and dicing
Next by thread: Re: Slicing and dicing
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread