[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: change in isakmp/oakley

To: Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>
Subject: Re: change in isakmp/oakley
From: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 10:24:19 -0400
cc: ipsec@tis.com, dharkins@cisco.com
In-reply-to: hugo's message of "Thu, 25 Sep 1997 05:01:55 -0400". <199709250901.MAA04293@ee.technion.ac.il>
References: <199709250901.MAA04293@ee.technion.ac.il>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

In message <199709250901.MAA04293@ee.technion.ac.il>, Hugo Krawczyk writes:
> However, Moni Naor pointed out to me that  this last form may not
> provide all the mixing of Ni and Nr

Can we *please* get these protocols stable and published?

In other words, stop changing it unless "may not" becomes "must not".

-- 
Harald Koch

References:

change in isakmp/oakley

From: Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>

Prev by Date: Re: change in isakmp/oakley
Next by Date: Re: [Ottawa bakeoff feedback] problem with ESP Padding
Prev by thread: change in isakmp/oakley
Next by thread: Re: change in isakmp/oakley
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread