[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: change in isakmp/oakley

To: Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>, chk@utcc.utoronto.ca, ho@earth.hpc.org
Subject: Re: change in isakmp/oakley
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 13:12:05 -0400
Cc: dharkins@cisco.com, ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199709251439.RAA10983@ee.technion.ac.il>
Reply-To: rgm3@chrysler.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

At 05:39 PM 9/25/97 +0300, Hugo Krawczyk wrote:
>
>Now, since the isakmp/oakley draft is going to change 
>anyway, this one is well worth doing. As I said, this change
>does not require or influence changes in other parts of the 
>spec.

Yes, there will be a new isakmp/oakley draft.  It will be editorial, and
roll in agreed upon items (like some stuff from Oakley, and your
enc-encrypt mode).  None of these impact the protocol.

Changes that impact the protocol need significant justification.  Such
changes may occur.  There are still two more points for changes:  IPsecond
and proposed->draft standard.

Robert Moskowitz
Chrysler Corporation
(810) 758-8212

References:

Re: change in isakmp/oakley

From: Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>

Prev by Date: Re: change in isakmp/oakley
Next by Date: Re: [Ottawa bakeoff feedback] problem with ESP Padding
Prev by thread: Re: change in isakmp/oakley
Next by thread: Re: change in isakmp/oakley
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread