Re: Which DOI for the pilot?

["Michael C. Richardson" <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Rizwan" == Rizwan Mallal <rmallal@raptor.com> writes:
    Rizwan> For the pilot are we now going to be using DOI-4 or are we
    Rizwan> still sticking to DOI-3 that was tested out in Ottawa???

  Unlike DOI-2 to DOI-3, DOI-4 does not redefine any constants, so (I
think) DOI-3 and DOI-4 might interoperate, except in the case where
someone didn't put the SA lifetime duration after the lifetype
attribute. Am I right Dan?

  In general, we also have a desire to have vendor ID (probably hash
of a strong) in the phase 1 message, so that we can define private
attributes when we notice we are talking to an instance of our own
product.

   :!mcr!:            |  Network security programming, currently
   Michael Richardson | on contract with SSH IPSEC (http://www.ssh.fi/)
 WWW: <A HREF="http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/People/Michael_Richardson/Bio.html">mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca</A>. PGP key available.
          Winner of the 1997 O.C.D.L.D.L.P. award.








-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQB1AwUBNC9QpaZpLyXYhL+BAQH9mwL9Has1nsBLUtha7kUGqefISzZhWDhtcbEE
bZD4tWCVOtxiCjNcARYKrVMnKtQk5GLR9aB4dh8tM7q7eXvF2TIPLCtU5EnZk2Ux
U8zQuqze1bvLIfFQnLQ/rdgWs+C8bwcy
=vgHu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: Which DOI for the pilot?
• From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>

---

• Prev by Date: survey form update
• Next by Date: Re: change in isakmp/oakley
• Prev by thread: survey form update
• Next by thread: Re: Which DOI for the pilot?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread