[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which DOI for the pilot?

To: ipsec@tis.com, anx-sec@dot.netrex.net
Subject: Re: Which DOI for the pilot?
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 08:39:48 -0400
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199709290654.CAA03131@istari.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
References: <Your message of "Mon, 29 Sep 1997 15:11:52 EDT." <199709291905.PAA11801@raptor1.raptor.com>
Reply-To: rgm3@chrysler.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

At 02:54 AM 9/29/97 -0400, Michael C. Richardson wrote:
>
>  Unlike DOI-2 to DOI-3, DOI-4 does not redefine any constants, so (I
>think) DOI-3 and DOI-4 might interoperate, except in the case where
>someone didn't put the SA lifetime duration after the lifetype
>attribute. Am I right Dan?
>
Based on past experience, I and my colleagues perfer that the software
tested at Ottawa (for DOI-3) be the baseline for the pilot.  Once we have
the lab up, software revs can be tested there.

Obviously, if a vendor feels that they do not need to make any software
changes for DOI-4, they can go ahead and state that for their lab/pilot
configurations.


Robert Moskowitz
Chrysler Corporation
(810) 758-8212

References:

Re: Which DOI for the pilot?

From: "Michael C. Richardson" <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: change in isakmp/oakley
Next by Date: WG Last Call
Prev by thread: Re: Which DOI for the pilot?
Next by thread: WG Last Call
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread