Re: What do you do in case of initiate collisions?

[Shin Yoshida <yoshida@rcom.sei.co.jp>]

Hilarie Orman wrote:
> 
> >   >We're running into a bit of a problem and haven't found any specific
> >   >answers.  Basically, we need to know how people are resolving the
> >   >problem where two systems start overlapping exchange sessions to
> >   >each other (the cross in the mail syndrome).
> >   >
> >   >It looks something like this
> >   >
> >   >A ----> B         (A initiates a session with B)
> >   >A <---- B         (B initiates a session with A)
> 
> Can A simply assume that B is responding?

If the request packet from B proposes two or more
transforms, how should A respond to the "response"?

Shin

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: What do you do in case of initiate collisions?
• From: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>

References:

• Re: What do you do in case of initiate collisions?
• From: ho@earth.hpc.org (Hilarie Orman)

---

• Prev by Date: Re: proposed changes to ISAKMP/Oakley
• Next by Date: Re: What do you do in case of initiate collisions?
• Prev by thread: Re: What do you do in case of initiate collisions?
• Next by thread: Re: What do you do in case of initiate collisions?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread