In message <Chameleon.877496890.rja@c8-a.snvl1.sfba.home.com>, Ran Atkinson writes: > > It is actually important that these semantics be clearly described somewhere. > If implementations don't use the same semantics, then badness is a high > probability outcome. Maybe I'm being unclear, but this is exactly the issue I'm wrestling with right now. -- Harald <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>