[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results

To: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 21:11:39 -0500
Address: 1 Amherst St., Cambridge, MA 02139
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>, ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: Daniel Harkins's message of Thu, 30 Oct 1997 17:02:56 -0800,<199710310102.RAA16442@dharkins-ss20>
Phone: (617) 253-8091
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

   Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 17:02:56 -0800
   From: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>

   Anti-replay protection is "the right thing". We should assume the other guy
   is always doing the right thing.....

   I hum loudly for C (and in C too :-).

Dan,

You make a number of good points.  However, given that this is after the
last call period, if we're going to change the text, I would think that
we need to get a lot of hums from others very quickly, and no strenuous
objections.  If not, we should probably leave things the way they are.

At some point, we need to shoot the engineers and just ship the
product....

						- Ted

References:

Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results

From: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results
Next by Date: Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results
Prev by thread: Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results
Next by thread: Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread