[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results

To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results
From: Matt Thomas <matt.thomas@altavista-software.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 06:59:57 -0500
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199710310102.RAA16442@dharkins-ss20>
References: <Your message of "Tue, 28 Oct 1997 01:18:30 EST." <199710280618.BAA24149@dcl.MIT.EDU>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

At 05:02 PM 10/30/97 -0800, Daniel Harkins wrote:
>>  C) AR ON   R MAY notify S that - No changes to Oakley/- NOTIFY is unreliable,
>> 	    AR is ON or OFF	  ISAKMP		  so S may stop sending
>> 				- Does not rely on 	  when didn't need to
>> 				  unreliable NOTIFY to	- Requires special case
>> 				  get S to monitor Seq#	  for manual keying

>I hum loudly for C (and in C too :-).

I hum for C as well.  We've exerted so much effort to add AR
(because of its importance), it should be the default.
-- 
Matt Thomas                    Internet:   matt.thomas@altavista-software.com
Internet Locksmith             WWW URL:    <coming eventually>
AltaVista Internet Software    Disclaimer: This message reflects my own
Littleton, MA                              warped views, etc.

References:

Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results

From: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results
Next by Date: Re: draft of the ISAKMP/Oakley draft
Prev by thread: Re: AH/ESP Last Call Results
Next by thread: Issue with GSSAPI and the ISAKMP/Oakley resolution document
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread