[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Extended authentication with ISAKMP/Oakley draft

To: "'Steven Bellovin'" <smb@research.att.com>, "'ipsec@tis.com'" <ipsec@tis.com>
Subject: RE: Extended authentication with ISAKMP/Oakley draft
From: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 13:46:06 -0500
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Yikes, no we are not changing ISAKMP/Oakley.  This 'variant' as you
called it is in a completely new draft that is suppose to be for
IPSecond.

>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Steven Bellovin [SMTP:smb@research.att.com]
>Sent:	Sunday, December 14, 1997 12:38 PM
>To:	ipsec@tis.com
>Subject:	Re: Extended authentication with ISAKMP/Oakley draft 
>
>Let's all agree on one thing, though -- barring a *major* flaw in
>the protocol, we are *not* changing ISAKMP/Oakley at this point.  If
>you have new variants that don't change the basic protocol, they should
>be written up in new RFCs.

Prev by Date: RE: Extended authentication with ISAKMP/Oakley draft
Next by Date: Re: Extended authentication with ISAKMP/Oakley draft
Prev by thread: RE: Extended authentication with ISAKMP/Oakley draft
Next by thread: RE: Re[2]: IPSEC document reading party!
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread