[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: some more issues on IPSEC
On Thu, 22 Jan 1998, Engineering wrote:
>
> We were talking to a customer who indicated there may be a draft on
> dynamic ip address registration for IPSEC remote client applications.
>
> Essentially, we are faced with implementing our own proprietary protocol
> like PPTP does.
>
> Does anyone have more information about any RFC's or drafts on this ?
>
If I understand what you are talking about it should be the draft that we
recently submitted to the IETF:
ftp://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tsirtsis-nat-bypass-00.txt
Let me know what you think...
> Jeffrey Goodwin
> President/CEO
> Ashley Laurent, Inc. www.osgroup.com
>
> ** Ashley Laurent,Inc. ** Software Development ** Consulting **
> * * *
> * 707 West Avenue, Suite 201 * voice: 512-322-0676 *
> * Austin, Texas 78701 * fax : 512-322-0680 *
> * web: http://www.osgroup.com *
> * Microsoft Solution Provider * Complete Systems Design/Development *
> * Novell Professional Developer * Systems Software/Device Drivers *
>
>
Best regards
George
-----------------------------
Internet Transport Research |
BTLABS |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice: This contribution is the personal view of the author and does not
necessarily reflect the technical nor commercial direction of British
Telecommunications plc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References: