[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: some issues about IPSec

To: Engineering <osgroup@laurent.osgroup.com>
Subject: Re: some issues about IPSec
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 17:21:11 -0500
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980122202341.20040A-100000@laurent.osgroup.com>
References: <199801221957.OAA14585@carp.morningstar.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Jeff,

Transport mode has less overhead than tunnel mode, because there is no need
for a second IP header, and that by itself makes it attractive in many
instances.

Steve

Follow-Ups:

Re: some issues about IPSec

From: Engineering <osgroup@laurent.osgroup.com>

References:

Re: some issues about IPSec

From: Ben Rogers <ben@Ascend.COM>

Re: some issues about IPSec

From: Engineering <osgroup@laurent.osgroup.com>

Prev by Date: Re: some issues about IPSec
Next by Date: Re: Per-socket policy and ISAKMP
Prev by thread: Re: some issues about IPSec
Next by thread: Re: some issues about IPSec
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread