[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL

To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>
Subject: RE: IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL
From: Norman Shulman <norm@tor.securecomputing.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 13:56:18 -0500
cc: "adams@cisco.com" <adams@cisco.com>, "'Theodore Y. Ts'o'" <tytso@MIT.EDU>, Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>, "ipsec@tis.com" <ipsec@tis.com>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980220120445.009c5ba0@homebase.htt-consult.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

On Fri, 20 Feb 1998, Robert Moskowitz wrote:

> There was one position that the IETF does
> not specify weakning DES to 40 bits (then why ARCFour?, sigh).

RC4-128, as well as RC4-40 for export.

Norm


                    Norman Shulman      Secure Computing Canada
     	         Systems Developer      Tel 1 416 813 2075
      norm@tor.securecomputing.com      Fax 1 416 813 2001

References:

RE: IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL

From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>

Prev by Date: Re: IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL
Next by Date: IPSEC Arch, ports, and tunnel mode SAs
Prev by thread: RE: IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL
Next by thread: RE: IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread