[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Regrouping for IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL

To: tytso@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Regrouping for IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL
From: ho@earth.hpc.org (Hilarie Orman)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 21:28:35 -0500
Cc: plambert@certicom.com, ipsec@tis.com
In-reply-to: Yourmessage <199802210440.XAA04852@dcl.MIT.EDU>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

> Should we remove the EC groups altogether and defer these issues to
> IPSECOND?

There's a scene in Music Man where everyone goes around singing
"trouble, trouble, trouble, trouble."  Meant to show a kind of small-town
attitude, as I remember.  Rabelais, Bal-zac.  EC.

The groups are optional.  The NEWGROUP mode has always been there
exactly for the purpose of accommodating the expected drift of
the opinio-of-the-art.  And there will never be a last call that
doesn't bring out controversy.

But no Y coordinate ... :-)  ref. obs.

Hilarie

References:

Re: Regrouping for IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL

From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: key derivation for ESP Authentication Algorithm
Next by Date: Re: IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL
Prev by thread: Re: Regrouping for IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL
Next by thread: Re: Regrouping for IPSEC WORKING GROUP LAST CALL
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread