[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ISAKMP-09 diagrams

To: wdm@epoch.ncsc.mil (W. Douglas Maughan)
Subject: Re: ISAKMP-09 diagrams
From: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 10:32:31 -0500
cc: mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca, ipsec@tis.com, scottg@ftm.disa.mil
In-reply-to: wdm's message of "Mon, 09 Mar 1998 07:30:25 -0500". <9803091230.AA05340@dolphin.ncsc.mil>
References: <9803091230.AA05340@dolphin.ncsc.mil>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

In message <9803091230.AA05340@dolphin.ncsc.mil>, W. Douglas Maughan writes:
> 
> I'm willing to change the diagrams, but there are documents that
> describe the current format as the correct one. As an example, look at
> section 3 of draft-ietf-stdguide-ops-05.txt.
> 
> IPSEC-ers, what say ye?

It's nice that someone is writing such a "how to write standards" document.
A quick search through the Internet Standards archive shows that numbering
from 0 on the left, to 31 on the right, is how most (all?) current documents
are written.

In other words, the ISAKMP doc is correct.

-- 
Harald

References:

ISAKMP-09 diagrams

From: wdm@epoch.ncsc.mil (W. Douglas Maughan)

Prev by Date: Proposal to formalize the Notification Data field
Next by Date: Re: Certificate Requesting
Prev by thread: ISAKMP-09 diagrams
Next by thread: [?] changes for Ipsec Arch. ???
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread