[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comments on ...isakmp-mode-cfg-02



Roy Pereira wrote:

> This same converstaion has gone on for a couple of weeks off the mailing
> list as well, so I'd like to propose the following:
> 
> 1) A separate Config payload is defined.
> 2) Support for ISAKMP-Cfg is denoted by a ISAKMP version of 1.1 or
> higher.  Support does not mean you actually use it, just that it does
> not break your implementation.
> 
> Comments?

This makes more sense. Since the draft is relatively new, it will
(probably) be hashed out in IPSECond. That being the case, it makes
sense to properly integrate the functionality into the protocol.



References: