[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-cbc-02.txt

To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-cbc-02.txt
From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 17:53:27 -0500 (EST)
cc: IPSEC Mailing List <ipsec@tis.com>
In-Reply-To: <199803161942.OAA24677@dcl.MIT.EDU>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

> ...but to not claim to have an exhaustive listing of all possible
> weak keys in the document.  That way, when researchers come up with new
> and interesting weak keys in IDEA, implementations be updated without
> implementors worrying about violating the spec.

Perhaps (in the long run) it would be worth putting the "known weak keys" 
lists -- not just for IDEA, but for all the ciphers -- in a separate
informational RFC? 

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@spsystems.net
                                                     (henry@zoo.toronto.edu)

References:

Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-cbc-02.txt

From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-cbc-02.txt
Next by Date: Re: new IKE draft
Prev by thread: Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-cbc-02.txt
Next by thread: Re: draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-cbc-02.txt
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread