[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: some comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-04.txt

To: Bill Sommerfeld <wes@epilogue.com>
Subject: Re: some comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-04.txt
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 20:57:38 -0500 (EST)
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <9803161853.aa10914@khitomer.epilogue.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Bill,

I agree with your suggested editorial changes.  WRT the wildcarding, the
intent is to match exactly what is in IKE, to avoid negotiation vs. SPD
mismatches, so we will reword to better reflect that. The text about OPAQUE
transport protocols may be left over from when we distinguished between the
transport layer protocol and the "next" protocol as different selectors.
Since we simplified to a single selector, this text may not be necessary.

Steve

References:

some comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-04.txt

From: Bill Sommerfeld <wes@epilogue.com>

Prev by Date: Re: comments on ...isakmp-mode-cfg-02
Next by Date: Re: Complyence
Prev by thread: some comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-04.txt
Next by thread: Complyence
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread