[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

No Subject

XAA08159; Wed, 18 Mar 1998 23:19:04 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 23:19:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
To: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
cc: "IPSEC Mailing List (E-mail)" <ipsec@tis.com>
Subject: Re: is manual keying mandatory
In-Reply-To:
<c=US%a=_%p=TimeStep_Corpora%l=TSNTSRV2-980318211528Z-1390@tsntsrv2.timestep
.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.980318231740.8025A-100000@spsystems.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ipsec@portal.ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

> Is manual keying a required feature of IPSec?  
> In other words, if you do not support manual keying then are you
> IPSec-compliant or not?
> There seams to bea bit of confusion...

I don't see where the confusion comes from.  draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-04.txt
repeatedly and explicitly states that support for both manual and automatic
keying is mandatory.

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@spsystems.net
                                                     (henry@zoo.toronto.edu)