[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: is manual keying mandatory

To: bkavsan@ire-ma.com
Subject: Re: is manual keying mandatory
From: Phil Servita <meister@epilogue.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 98 11:35:36 -0500
CC: ipsec@tis.com
In-reply-to: <351126A1.863BD33B@ire-ma.com> (message from Bronislav Kavsan onThu, 19 Mar 1998 09:07:29 -0500)
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com


   I like Manual Keying and all the benefits of it - and I think it deserves
   SHOULD or MAY. I don't love at the extent of a MUST ;-)

What do people think of the following statement:

"I like PING and all the benefits of it - and i think it deserves SHOULD 
or MAY. I dont think it deserves a MUST. After all, given all the work 
we have done on TCP, we should be able to phase out PING from the host 
requirements." 

Manual keying will always be useful, even if just for verifying that the 
low-level mechanisms are working. I think it needs to stay at MUST.

                                     -phil

References:

Re: is manual keying mandatory

From: Bronislav Kavsan <bkavsan@ire-ma.com>

Prev by Date: Re: is manual keying mandatory
Next by Date: Re: is manual keying mandatory (fwd)
Prev by thread: Re: is manual keying mandatory
Next by thread: RE: is manual keying mandatory
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread