[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: is manual keying mandatory

To: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: is manual keying mandatory
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 14:10:16 -0500
Address: 1 Amherst St., Cambridge, MA 02139
In-Reply-To: Steve Sneddon's message of Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:16:00 -0800,<2.2.32.19980319221600.006f5894@trix.cisco.com>
Phone: (617) 253-8091
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com



Can we please consider the issue of manual keying to be closed, please?
We've gone over this before many times --- and the only way to make
progress is to avoid continually revisiting issues which we've decided
in the past.  The Security Architecture document very clearly states
that manual keying is mandatory; there shouldn't be any confusion on
this issue at all.  Some of you may disagree with this decision, but we
decided this months ago.  Can we please give it a rest?

							- Ted

References:

Re: is manual keying mandatory

From: Steve Sneddon <sned@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: [Marcia Beaulieu: Re: Is it possible to multicast IPSEC]
Next by Date: Re: Please review draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-sec-03.txt
Prev by thread: Re: is manual keying mandatory
Next by thread: RE: is manual keying mandatory
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread