Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to

["M.C.Nelson" <netsec@panix.com>]

On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Scott G. Kelly wrote:

> 
> On a more serious note, in terms of complexity, I don't think you can
> avoid it. Hackers are pretty sophisticated people (or at least, the ones
> capable of compromising your banking transactions are), and so complex
> measures are required. 

I'm afraid that I miss your logic here.  One can thing of lots of
counter examples.

> 
> but these gateways *are* endpoints with respect to security.
>  
 ... and 68% - 80% of attacks are launched from the local part
 of the network.

---

References:

• Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to
• From: "Scott G. Kelly" <skelly@redcreek.com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard
• Next by Date: Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to
• Prev by thread: Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to
• Next by thread: Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread