[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Last Call for IPSEC
Daniel Harkins wrote:
>
> The "flaw"? The name is a flaw?
>
How to respond... nothing personal here, Dan. The flaw is in the logic
of the argument that since this is 'the' key exchange for IP, it should
be called the IP key exchange. The argument against is simply that the
title is misleading and unecessarily broad. I know it's your document,
and the post is not meant as an insult. It's an observation. Take it
easy.
> If there was any doubt
> anywhere that the IPSec WG was finished, I hope this rediculous discussion
> dispells it.
>
Agreed - end of my input on this one.
Follow-Ups:
References: