[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Last Call for IPSEC
I'm not taking it personally and I don't feel insulted. The vision you
should have in mind is not bloodshot eyes and smoke leaving ears, it's the
slackjawed, "jeez, I can't believe it!" My point is, is that this is a well
travelled path I'm on here. If anyone has a problem with the name IKE then
I hope it's a problem with a half dozen (actually, I think it's more like
a "wild mileau of") other protocols too, otherwise it _is_ personal.
Criticize IKE for being complicated, poorly written or whatever but if
naming is an issue let's argue about "The Pre-Shared Key for The Internet".
That's something that I'm taking personally (insert emoticon here).
Dan.
> How to respond... nothing personal here, Dan. The flaw is in the logic
> of the argument that since this is 'the' key exchange for IP, it should
> be called the IP key exchange. The argument against is simply that the
> title is misleading and unecessarily broad. I know it's your document,
> and the post is not meant as an insult. It's an observation. Take it
> easy.
References: