[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Karen Seo: Thomas Narten -- clarification, etc.]

To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: [Karen Seo: Thomas Narten -- clarification, etc.]
From: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 15:27:28 -0400
cc: Thomas Narten <narten@raleigh.ibm.com>, jis@MIT.EDU, ipsec@tis.com, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

	 None of these choices are particularly palatable.  Just so I
	 understand the IPV6 issues a little better --- how likely is
	 it that we will want to invent new extension headers?  And how
	 likely is it that the ordering will matter and that the new
	 extension header will have to be before the AH header, and
	 could not be placed after the AH header?

Well, Vern Paxson and I are talking about a new header right now -- and
it would have to be mutable.

Prev by Date: Re: [Karen Seo: Thomas Narten -- clarification, etc.]
Next by Date: Re: IPSEC standardization status
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread