[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Latest AH/ESP/Arch drafts and changes

To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: Latest AH/ESP/Arch drafts and changes
From: Peter Curran <pcurran@ticl.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 22:53:20 +0100
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@raleigh.ibm.com>, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>, Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>, jis@MIT.EDU, ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199805131927.PAA26583@dcl.MIT.EDU>
References: <Thomas Narten's message of Wed, 13 May 1998 09:05:11 -0400,<199805131305.JAA18204@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Ted

>	Question: is this important enough for us to add this clarifying
>text now, or can we batch this change until the IPSEC specifications get
>revised for elevation to Draft standard?
>

IMHO, lets get this ball rolling and fix the problem next time round.

Peter

References:

Re: Latest AH/ESP/Arch drafts and changes

From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: [Q] SA lookup on receive
Next by Date: Re: 40bit DES? & IBM Patents
Prev by thread: Re: Latest AH/ESP/Arch drafts and changes
Next by thread: Re: Latest AH/ESP/Arch drafts and changes
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread