[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ISAKMP Implementation Analysis

To: rct@epoch.ncsc.mil (Ruth C. Taylor)
Subject: Re: ISAKMP Implementation Analysis
From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 16:10:30 -0400
Cc: ipsec@tis.com, isakmp-oakley@cisco.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Jun 1998 15:32:46 EDT." <9806051932.AA00265@gareb.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

To: rct@epoch.ncsc.mil (Ruth C. Taylor)
Subject: Re: ISAKMP Implementation Analysis 
Cc: ipsec@tis.com, isakmp-oakley@cisco.com
Date: 06/05/98, 16:10:27


> I am interested in comparing current freely available ISAKMP-
> Oakley implementations for BSD platforms, such as Cisco's ISAKMP 
> code and "Pluto" by Angelos Keromytis.

I don't think there's any kind of comparison to be made here. The
pluto code was written in 3 weeks' time, trying to meet a deadline. As
such, it looks (looked) more like a prototype implementation than
something that could/should be deployed. The FreeSWAN people are
maintaining it (since June '97), and I'll let them answer your
questions, since things are likely to have changed.
- -Angelos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBNXhQtL0pBjh2h1kFAQHOnwP7BDLNTOn3kfEXVPXxUgIeRXTigZd3IOrO
cnRnwcEvW0yyE2Tseq9Dxm89PITbKytjmLuuu2m22OnoqshzGNgmYoFTFhrsD0xt
nYwgE2OvoY1DxYgs4/YI53Yp6M189PbjcMrpLeZQReHvIN/FiV0ggQurOru68XXZ
Vvx9d6penVQ=
=zA0i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:

ISAKMP Implementation Analysis

From: rct@epoch.ncsc.mil (Ruth C. Taylor)

Prev by Date: ISAKMP Implementation Analysis
Next by Date: commercial IPSEC in Europe?
Prev by thread: ISAKMP Implementation Analysis
Next by thread: commercial IPSEC in Europe?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread