[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: use of client IDs

To: Bryan Gleeson <BGleeson@shastanets.com>, Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: use of client IDs
From: Bryan Gleeson <BGleeson@shastanets.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 23:37:47 -0700
Cc: Pyda Srisuresh <suresh@livingston.com>, skelly@redcreek.com, ipsec@tis.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com


correcting my previous post ...
 
> ... Thus the semantics of an absent client ID are "anyone 
> behind this trusted gateway", not "anyone". 

Dan pointed out that this is completely wrong. What I meant 
to say was "the semantics of an absent client ID *should be*
anyone behind this trusted gatway ..."

Bryan

Follow-Ups:

RE: use of client IDs

From: Chris Boscolo <chrisb@watchguard.com>

Re: use of client IDs

From: Pyda Srisuresh <suresh@livingston.com>

Prev by Date: RE: use of client IDs
Next by Date: RE: Multiple Certificate Request Payloads
Prev by thread: RE: use of client IDs
Next by thread: RE: use of client IDs
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread