[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Byte-count lifetime enforcement?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

To: Charles Lynn <clynn@BBN.COM>
Subject: Re: Byte-count lifetime enforcement? 
Cc: ipsec@tis.com, Dan McDonald <danmcd@eng.sun.com>
Date: 06/30/98, 22:59:53


In message <199807010255.WAA04197@codex.cis.upenn.edu>, Charles Lynn writes:
>
>How do folks feel about adding Dan's clarification to the Architecture
>document?

If it goes in (I don't object), then you should probably add another
sentence to the effect that implementations should expect those
counters to get out of sync, either because of network failures or
because other implementations aren't doing things quite the same way.
- -Angelos


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBNZmmKb0pBjh2h1kFAQE/HwP8DcVcL3zAaJzf9dW/xNksnmgWyuRuEvNG
bdwR/XEhT32tTKnDh0kqCeZgWCYsBnYB/yYrFaYsW7j58bqdWAehgYHHWWCvqnj+
dxASe2njLJSE6swWq/DPuv6PJCj/ocCN6OUPPriuqvKLZcxaS5AKAkt3xZMUXKbv
r2cTdAlsosk=
=qf8K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----