[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Revised drafts -- Arch, AH, ESP

To: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: Revised drafts -- Arch, AH, ESP
From: FUKUMOTO Atsushi <fukumoto@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 14:21:52 +0900
cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-reply-to: kseo's message of "Thu, 02 Jul 1998 17:08:28 EDT." <199807022114.RAA18455@relay.hq.tis.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Regarding IPSEC architecture draft, I have a question:
>    Changed Section 6.1.2.1 from:
:
>    To:
>           o PMTU message with >64 bits of IPsec header -- If the ICMP
>             message contains more information from the original packet
>             then there MAY be enough non-opaque information to


I couldn't understand why "MAY" is used here instead of lowercase
"may".  Is it really "MAY" in RFC2119 way of definition?  (There are
some other similar capitalization I couldn't understand in the draft.)


						FUKUMOTO Atsushi
						fukumoto@imasy.or.jp

References:

Revised drafts -- Arch, AH, ESP

From: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>

Prev by Date: DH-less encryption mode for IKE
Next by Date: IPsec and Fragmentation
Prev by thread: Revised drafts -- Arch, AH, ESP
Next by thread: Re: Revised drafts -- Arch, AH, ESP
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread