[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: simultaneous lifetime type support required?
Derrell D. Piper wrote:
> >I recognize the need to support both types, but the question is, am I
> >required to support both types simultaneously? That is, if you send me 2
> >lifetime payloads together, one in kbytes and one in seconds, does this
> >mean you want both values used, with the actual expiration based upon
> >whichever occurs first?
>
> Yes.
>
> Derrell
Next question: where is the language which says I MUST implement this? As
previously posted, all I've seen is the stuff in DOI, which only relates to
phase 2, and doesn't (appear) to say MUST.
References: