[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DES-cracker built

To: Helger Lipmaa <helger@cyber.ee>
Subject: Re: DES-cracker built
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:52:29 -0400
cc: "Derrell D. Piper" <ddp@network-alchemy.com>, ipsec@tis.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 Jul 1998 18:31:47 +0300." <Pine.GSO.3.95.980717182848.17130A-100000@keeks>
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Helger Lipmaa writes:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 1998, Derrell D. Piper wrote:
> 
> > I can update the IPSEC DOI in, say, one minute...  
> 
> Being sarcastic: did you really have to way until today? A product I'm
> involved with supports DES only to be compatible with IPSEC drafts.  The
> product manuals have stating that from the very beginning, warning the
> customers _never_ to use DES. 

Lets just get on with it rather than fighting.

I think we all now agree that better than DES (I'm assuming 3DES) is
mandatory, especially since the O'Reilly book on the crack will
contain complete plans for the DES cracker.

Perry

Follow-Ups:

Re: DES-cracker built

From: "Derrell D. Piper" <ddp@network-alchemy.com>

References:

Re: DES-cracker built

From: Helger Lipmaa <helger@cyber.ee>

Prev by Date: Re: Hybrid Authentication and Remote Access
Next by Date: Re: DES-cracker built
Prev by thread: Re: DES-cracker built
Next by thread: Re: DES-cracker built
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread