Re: Comments on "Hybrid Auth. mode for IKE"

[Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>]

Moshe,

>So what you are saying is that every one that is not yet ready to use
>certificates and want to use a method not vulnerable to dictionary attack is
>not allowed to use IPSEC?

Gee, it sounds so negative when you say it that way ;-)!

How about, a vendor who wants to sell IPsec products should get its act
together and support IKE with certs, rather than taking shortcuts and using
"market demand"  as an excuse.

Yes, I definately like that phrasing better.

Steve

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: Comments on "Hybrid Auth. mode for IKE"
• From: Moshe Litvin <moshe@cale.checkpoint.com>

References:

• Re: Comments on "Hybrid Auth. mode for IKE"
• From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
• Re: Comments on "Hybrid Auth. mode for IKE"
• From: Moshe Litvin <moshe@checkpoint.com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: IPSec interop workshop Aug 31st - Sept 3 invitation
• Next by Date: Re: Comments on "Hybrid Auth. mode for IKE"
• Next by thread: Re: an inbound SPD-check question
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread