[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MSS option with IPSEC.

To: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@itojun.org>
Subject: Re: MSS option with IPSEC.
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 16:43:27 -0400
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 25 Aug 1998 04:21:41 +0900." <3302.903986501@turmeric.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

The mss value isn't as important as the path MTU; if your TCP
implements MTU discovery (and it interacts correctly with your ipsec
.. i.e., ipsec causes the percived MTU to shrink) the right thing
should happen as long as the MSS is big enough..

					- Bill

Follow-Ups:

Re: MSS option with IPSEC.

From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@iijlab.net>

References:

Re: MSS option with IPSEC.

From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@itojun.org>

Prev by Date: IKE use of DOI=0
Next by Date: Re: MSS option with IPSEC.
Prev by thread: Re: MSS option with IPSEC.
Next by thread: Re: MSS option with IPSEC.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread