[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)

To: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)
From: "Matt Crawford" <crawdad@fnal.gov>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 08:43:41 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 16 Sep 1998 01:36:14 PDT. <199809160836.BAA08003@hsmpka.eng.sun.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

> 	Is it ok for the source port for IKE to be something other than
> 	port 500?
> 
> Hopefully it is ok, as this eases ipsec across NAT boxes

Whoa!  Cognitive dissonance!

Follow-Ups:

Re: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)

From: suresh@livingston.com (Pyda Srisuresh)

References:

ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)

From: Gabriel.Montenegro@Eng.Sun.Com

Prev by Date: RE: null encryption
Next by Date: Re: Question about New Group mode
Prev by thread: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)
Next by thread: Re: ike source port (was: issues with IKE that need resolution)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread