[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST"
Michael C. Richardson wrote:
<trimmed...>
> Okay, I remember this discussion.
> Given this, I will change my opinion: we should leave the ID payload alone
> and define a new payload for phase II in ISAKMP version 1.1. If we need to
> define one or two additional payloads to solve actual problems that we
> honestly have *now*, that is fine, but I think we should think about
> a better solution. Perhaps we need to wait for some of the Policy WG people
> to advance a bit on admission policy to other things.
I agree that we should work on a more comprehensive solution. However,
we need this capability yesterday, and I'm sure other vendors do as
well. I guess I'm trying to prod some forward movement on this. This was
tossed out as a work item for ipsecond, but no clear course of action
was agreed upon. I guess the appropriate thing at this point is to look
to our chairs for guidance/direction. Bob, Ted, what say ye?
Scott
Follow-Ups:
References: