[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: issues with IKE that need resolution)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Scott" == Scott G Kelly <skelly@redcreek.com> writes:

    Scott> It occurs to me, looking back on my notes from Chicago, that BBN is
    Scott> working on something very closely related to this discussion. If so,
    Scott> much (if not all) of this exchange could be a waste of time.

  I don't know that this is the case. It is certainly true that it is
important to get a clear set of requirements for an extended ID payload and
other things. 

    Scott> Specifically, I'm referring to Luis Sanchez' presentation on 'Policy
    Scott> Based Security Management for IPSec'.

  I'm still hoping for lots and lots more details about the policy 
discovery work of Luis.
  Luis, will a paper or something be forthcoming?

   :!mcr!:            |  Network and security consulting/contract programming
   Michael Richardson |         Firewalls, TCP/IP and Unix administration
 Personal: http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/People/Michael_Richardson/Bio.html
 Corporate: http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/SSW/
	ON HUMILITY: To err is human, to moo bovine.




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQB1AwUBNgrOstiXVu0RiA21AQEzdwMAngkveFt7j0sjIxJI4+cOVLq3TBn3VtzV
DOMkdDZ+PMJLmmjcYmqS04CXXbrb8pFPcm5hojfWdUehpHjHirQIL0hOaRHxfBWO
RNvt1ukR9ckaSlr2drJNAtXM6w4Ar2ZP
=WbJm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Follow-Ups: References: