[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPsec vs SKIP Protocol

To: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: IPsec vs SKIP Protocol
From: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:17:32 -0700
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Sep 1998 03:09:58 PDT." <19980924100959.19457.qmail@hotmail.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

  Just for the record: Cisco does not and will not support 40bit IPSec. 

  Dan.

On Thu, 24 Sep 1998 03:09:58 PDT Robert Cosme wrote
> 
> Currently, I am working on a project and this has certain portion that 
> deals with encryption. The specification requires encryption and key 
> management SKIP. I'm not a guru of encryption although I know some 
> basics. Please explain to me SKIP and how do we contrast this with 
> IPSec. I am proposing a Cisco products which I know use IPSec - 40-DES 
> and 56-DES. Is there a 144-bit encryption?

References:

IPsec vs SKIP Protocol

From: "Robert Cosme" <rdcosme@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: issues with IKE that need resolution)
Next by Date: Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: issues with IKE that need resolution)
Prev by thread: IPsec vs SKIP Protocol
Next by thread: X.509 Spec
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread