[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: issues with IKE that need resolution)

To: tytso@MIT.EDU (Theodore Y. Ts'o)
Subject: Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: issues with IKE that need resolution)
From: bmanning@isi.edu
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: bmanning@isi.edu, skelly@redcreek.com, suresh@livingston.com, dharkins@cisco.com, ipsec@tis.com, lsanchez@bbn.com
In-Reply-To: <199809251919.PAA01300@dcl.MIT.EDU> from "Theodore Y. Ts'o" at Sep 25, 98 03:19:09 pm
Posted-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

> Yes, it's available along with the Chicago IPSEC minutes:
> 
> 	http://web.mit.edu/tytso/www/ipsec/chicago/lsanchez.ps
> 	http://web.mit.edu/tytso/www/ipsec/chicago/

	Thanks.

> Note that the postscript may cause some versions of ghostview to croak.
> I haven't figured out whether this is Microsoft's fault or ghostview's
> fault.  Ghostview 3.1 does work, as does viewing the postscript file
> using ghostscript directly.  (Why oh why does postscript files generated
> by MS-products cause so many problems?  Sigh...)

	Croaks for me.. :(
> 
> 							- Ted


--bill

References:

Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: issues with IKE that need resolution)

From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: issues with IKE that need resolution)
Next by Date: Update to ipsec.entrust.com
Prev by thread: Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: issues with IKE that need resolution)
Next by thread: Re: issues with IKE that need resolution
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread