[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: comments on VPN framework document

To: Stephen Waters <Stephen.Waters@digital.com>
Subject: RE: comments on VPN framework document
From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:40:01 -0400 (EDT)
cc: ipsec@tis.com, l2tp@zendo.com
In-Reply-To: <250F9C8DEB9ED011A14D08002BE4F64C01EB598A@wade.reo.dec.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Stephen Waters wrote:
> With IPSEC, there is no mechanism to define an 'Virtual IP interface' that
> can be managed as any other IP interface - routing/cost/filtering/.... 
> Perhaps this is just the way that I (and others) have implemented it...

Indeed so.  In fact, the Linux FreeS/WAN implementation of IPSEC currently
*does* use a virtual IP interface... and it causes enough headaches that
we're going to do something different as soon as the evolution of the
Linux kernel permits... 

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@spsystems.net
                                                     (henry@zoo.toronto.edu)

References:

RE: comments on VPN framework document

From: Stephen Waters <Stephen.Waters@digital.com>

Prev by Date: RE: comments on VPN framework document
Next by Date: Re: comments on VPN framework document
Prev by thread: RE: comments on VPN framework document
Next by thread: Re: comments on VPN framework document
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread